Zum Inhalt springen

Mitgliedschaftsvereinbarung

Diese Vorlage herunterladen

Erzeugt am 2026-08-31 · Alle Vorlagen herunterladen

Mitgliedschaftsstatus bei Unterzeichnung

What is someone agreeing to be, at the moment they sign?

RCOS-Klauseln 3.1.2, 3.1.4
  • 3.1.2 Mindestens die folgenden Mitgliedschaftsstatus MUSS existieren:
  • 3.1.4 Keine Einzelperson KANN gleichzeitig mehrere Mitgliedschaftsstatus innehaben.
Warum den Status bei Unterzeichnung festhalten?
Wie du diesen Abschnitt ausfüllst

Was hineingehört

  • Which membership state does someone hold the moment they sign this agreement — named exactly as in our Membership State Registry?
  • Does everyone sign at the same point, or can signing happen at different stages — and which state does each signing give?
  • How does the person see, before they sign, which state they are agreeing to enter?

Beispiele

Anyone who signs this agreement after their application is approved becomes a Trial Member on the day they sign. They become a Full Member only when their onboarding completion is recorded; signing alone never makes someone a Full Member.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Rechte der Mitglieder

What are each member's rights, in proportion to what we ask of them?

RCOS-Klauseln 3.4.1, 3.4.3, 3.4.4
  • 3.4.1 Die Gemeinschaft MUSS Mitgliedsrechte explizit definieren.
  • 3.4.3 Rechte und Pflichten MUSS symmetrisch und proportional zum Mitgliedschaftsstatus sein.
  • 3.4.4 Keine Pflicht KANN ohne ein entsprechendes, dokumentiertes Recht durchgesetzt werden.
Warum Rechte ausdrücklich aufzählen?
Wie du diesen Abschnitt ausfüllst

Was hineingehört

  • For each membership state: which rights does a member in that state hold?
  • Which rights hold for everyone, in every state — such as raising a concern without retaliation, or leaving at any time?
  • Do the rights of each state match what we ask of that state, so that the more we ask, the more protection and say a member has?
  • Where a right is set in another document — voting in the Decision Matrix, roles in the Role Registry — do we point to it rather than write it twice?

Beispiele

Every member, in any state, may raise a conflict through the Conflict Resolution Ladder without retaliation, read the community's governance records, and leave at any time. Trial Members may also join all meetings and propose agenda items. Full Members may additionally vote on decisions as set out in the Decision Matrix, hold roles listed in the Role Registry, and propose changes to any agreement. Full Members carry the work rota and shared costs, so they also hold the vote that Trial Members do not.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Pflichten der Mitglieder

What does the community expect of each member — and where does that expectation stop?

RCOS-Klauseln 3.4.2, 3.4.4, 3.4.5
  • 3.4.2 Die Gemeinschaft MUSS Mitgliedspflichten explizit definieren.
  • 3.4.4 Keine Pflicht KANN ohne ein entsprechendes, dokumentiertes Recht durchgesetzt werden.
  • 3.4.5 Pflichten DARF NICHT unbefristet oder undefiniert sein.
Warum Pflichten eng begrenzen?
Wie du diesen Abschnitt ausfüllst

Was hineingehört

  • For each obligation: what exactly is asked, and how would a member know whether they are meeting it?
  • Where does each obligation stop — how much, how often, for how long?
  • Which documented right does each obligation correspond to? (The rights themselves are their own question.)
  • Which obligations apply in every membership state, and which only in some?
  • Is there anything we quietly expect of members that is not written down — and should we write it down or drop it?

Beispiele

Every member keeps to our identity constraints, takes part in a conflict process when named as a party, does not speak for the community in public without a mandate from the general meeting, and does not use community money or accounts beyond the authority a role gives them. Each obligation is matched by a right in this agreement, such as the right to a fair process and to hold roles. Nothing else may be required of a member unless this list is changed by decision.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Erwartungen an Teilnahme und Beitrag

What counts as participation, how much is enough, may someone send a stand-in — and what happens when someone stops?

RCOS-Klauseln 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.3, 3.5.4
  • 3.5.1 Erwartungen an die Teilnahme MUSS explizit definiert werden.
  • 3.5.2 Akzeptable Formen des Beitrags MUSS aufgelistet werden.
  • 3.5.3 Stellvertretende Teilnahme (z. B. Auslagerung von Arbeit) MUSS explizit geregelt sein.
  • 3.5.4 Anhaltende Nicht-Teilnahme MUSS einen Rechenschaftsprozess auslösen, wie in Schicht 4 definiert.
Warum Teilnahme in Zahlen definieren?
Wie du diesen Abschnitt ausfüllst

Was hineingehört

  • Which forms of contribution do we recognise?
  • How much is enough — how many contributions, of which kinds, over what period?
  • May someone send a stand-in, or pay someone to do their share — for which tasks, and who stays responsible?
  • How does someone tell us they will be away, and for how long can expectations be paused?
  • After how long without participation, and without notice, does an accountability process start — and who starts it? (What that process does is set in the Conflict Resolution Ladder.)

Beispiele

We recognise four forms of contribution: work-days on the land, cooking for shared meals, facilitating or taking minutes at meetings, and tasks from the maintenance rota. Each member contributes at least 8 hours a month across any of these. A member may swap a task with another member, but may not pay an outsider to do their share. Expectations pause for up to 3 months if the member tells the membership steward in advance. Two consecutive months below the minimum without notice opens an accountability check.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Verweis auf ordentliches Verfahren

What protects a member when the community turns against them?

RCOS-Klauseln 3.6.3
  • 3.6.3 Erzwungener Austritt MUSS einem ordnungsgemäßen Verfahren folgen und über die Mechanismen von Schicht 4 abgewickelt werden.
Warum das ordentliche Verfahren hier nochmals erwähnen?
Wie du diesen Abschnitt ausfüllst

Was hineingehört

  • Which documents protect a member against removal, suspension or restricted access — and does this agreement name each one?
  • In one or two plain sentences, what do we promise here, so that nobody is removed or restricted under a rule they were never shown?
  • How does a member reading this agreement find the current version of those documents?

Beispiele

No member can be removed, suspended or have their access restricted except through the processes in our Conflict Resolution Ladder and our Exit & Separation Protocol. Both are linked from this agreement. No rule that is not written in one of those two documents can be used against a member.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Ratifizierungsprotokoll

Who adopted this agreement, when, and how was it decided?

Wir würden Besuche gern mit Google Analytics zählen. Cookies werden nur gesetzt, wenn du zustimmst; eine Ablehnung ändert sonst nichts an der Website. Datenschutz