Saltar al contenido

Acuerdo de Membresía

Descargar esta plantilla

Generado el 2026-08-31 · Descargar todas las plantillas

Estado de Membresía al Firmar

What is someone agreeing to be, at the moment they sign?

Cláusulas RCOS 3.1.2, 3.1.4
  • 3.1.2 Como mínimo, DEBEN existir los siguientes estados de membresía:
  • 3.1.4 Ningún individuo PUEDE ostentar múltiples estados de membresía simultáneamente.
¿Por qué declarar el estado al firmar?
Cómo completar esta sección

Qué cubrir

  • Which membership state does someone hold the moment they sign this agreement — named exactly as in our Membership State Registry?
  • Does everyone sign at the same point, or can signing happen at different stages — and which state does each signing give?
  • How does the person see, before they sign, which state they are agreeing to enter?

Ejemplos

Anyone who signs this agreement after their application is approved becomes a Trial Member on the day they sign. They become a Full Member only when their onboarding completion is recorded; signing alone never makes someone a Full Member.

Ejemplos, no recomendaciones. Sus respuestas serán las suyas.

Derechos del Miembro

What are each member's rights, in proportion to what we ask of them?

Cláusulas RCOS 3.4.1, 3.4.3, 3.4.4
  • 3.4.1 La comunidad DEBE definir explícitamente los derechos de los miembros.
  • 3.4.3 Los derechos y obligaciones DEBEN ser simétricos y proporcionales al estado de membresía.
  • 3.4.4 Ninguna obligación PUEDE ser exigida sin un derecho correspondiente y documentado.
¿Por qué enumerar los derechos explícitamente?
Cómo completar esta sección

Qué cubrir

  • For each membership state: which rights does a member in that state hold?
  • Which rights hold for everyone, in every state — such as raising a concern without retaliation, or leaving at any time?
  • Do the rights of each state match what we ask of that state, so that the more we ask, the more protection and say a member has?
  • Where a right is set in another document — voting in the Decision Matrix, roles in the Role Registry — do we point to it rather than write it twice?

Ejemplos

Every member, in any state, may raise a conflict through the Conflict Resolution Ladder without retaliation, read the community's governance records, and leave at any time. Trial Members may also join all meetings and propose agenda items. Full Members may additionally vote on decisions as set out in the Decision Matrix, hold roles listed in the Role Registry, and propose changes to any agreement. Full Members carry the work rota and shared costs, so they also hold the vote that Trial Members do not.

Ejemplos, no recomendaciones. Sus respuestas serán las suyas.

Obligaciones del Miembro

What does the community expect of each member — and where does that expectation stop?

Cláusulas RCOS 3.4.2, 3.4.4, 3.4.5
  • 3.4.2 La comunidad DEBE definir explícitamente las obligaciones de los miembros.
  • 3.4.4 Ninguna obligación PUEDE ser exigida sin un derecho correspondiente y documentado.
  • 3.4.5 Las obligaciones NO DEBEN ser indefinidas o carecer de definición.
¿Por qué acotar las obligaciones estrictamente?
Cómo completar esta sección

Qué cubrir

  • For each obligation: what exactly is asked, and how would a member know whether they are meeting it?
  • Where does each obligation stop — how much, how often, for how long?
  • Which documented right does each obligation correspond to? (The rights themselves are their own question.)
  • Which obligations apply in every membership state, and which only in some?
  • Is there anything we quietly expect of members that is not written down — and should we write it down or drop it?

Ejemplos

Every member keeps to our identity constraints, takes part in a conflict process when named as a party, does not speak for the community in public without a mandate from the general meeting, and does not use community money or accounts beyond the authority a role gives them. Each obligation is matched by a right in this agreement, such as the right to a fair process and to hold roles. Nothing else may be required of a member unless this list is changed by decision.

Ejemplos, no recomendaciones. Sus respuestas serán las suyas.

Expectativas de Participación y Contribución

What counts as participation, how much is enough, may someone send a stand-in — and what happens when someone stops?

Cláusulas RCOS 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.3, 3.5.4
  • 3.5.1 Las expectativas de participación DEBEN estar definidas explícitamente.
  • 3.5.2 Las formas aceptables de contribución DEBEN estar enumeradas.
  • 3.5.3 La sustitución de participación (p. ej., externalización de trabajo) DEBE estar gobernada explícitamente.
  • 3.5.4 La falta persistente de participación DEBE activar un proceso de rendición de cuentas según lo definido en la Capa 4.
¿Por qué definir la participación con números?
Cómo completar esta sección

Qué cubrir

  • Which forms of contribution do we recognise?
  • How much is enough — how many contributions, of which kinds, over what period?
  • May someone send a stand-in, or pay someone to do their share — for which tasks, and who stays responsible?
  • How does someone tell us they will be away, and for how long can expectations be paused?
  • After how long without participation, and without notice, does an accountability process start — and who starts it? (What that process does is set in the Conflict Resolution Ladder.)

Ejemplos

We recognise four forms of contribution: work-days on the land, cooking for shared meals, facilitating or taking minutes at meetings, and tasks from the maintenance rota. Each member contributes at least 8 hours a month across any of these. A member may swap a task with another member, but may not pay an outsider to do their share. Expectations pause for up to 3 months if the member tells the membership steward in advance. Two consecutive months below the minimum without notice opens an accountability check.

Ejemplos, no recomendaciones. Sus respuestas serán las suyas.

Referencia al Debido Proceso

What protects a member when the community turns against them?

Cláusulas RCOS 3.6.3
  • 3.6.3 La salida forzosa DEBE seguir el debido proceso y gestionarse a través de los mecanismos de la Capa 4.
¿Por qué reiterar el debido proceso aquí?
Cómo completar esta sección

Qué cubrir

  • Which documents protect a member against removal, suspension or restricted access — and does this agreement name each one?
  • In one or two plain sentences, what do we promise here, so that nobody is removed or restricted under a rule they were never shown?
  • How does a member reading this agreement find the current version of those documents?

Ejemplos

No member can be removed, suspended or have their access restricted except through the processes in our Conflict Resolution Ladder and our Exit & Separation Protocol. Both are linked from this agreement. No rule that is not written in one of those two documents can be used against a member.

Ejemplos, no recomendaciones. Sus respuestas serán las suyas.

Registro de Ratificación

Who adopted this agreement, when, and how was it decided?

Nos gustaría contar las visitas con Google Analytics. Solo instala cookies si aceptas; rechazarlas no cambia nada más en el sitio. Política de privacidad