Pular para o conteúdo

Acordo de Associação

Baixar este modelo

Gerado em 2026-08-31 · Baixar todos os modelos

Estado de Associação na Assinatura

What is someone agreeing to be, at the moment they sign?

Cláusulas RCOS 3.1.2, 3.1.4
  • 3.1.2 No mínimo, os seguintes estados de filiação DEVEM existir:
  • 3.1.4 Nenhum indivíduo PODE manter múltiplos estados de filiação simultaneamente.
Por que declarar o estado na assinatura?
Como preencher esta seção

O que abordar

  • Which membership state does someone hold the moment they sign this agreement — named exactly as in our Membership State Registry?
  • Does everyone sign at the same point, or can signing happen at different stages — and which state does each signing give?
  • How does the person see, before they sign, which state they are agreeing to enter?

Exemplos

Anyone who signs this agreement after their application is approved becomes a Trial Member on the day they sign. They become a Full Member only when their onboarding completion is recorded; signing alone never makes someone a Full Member.

Exemplos, não recomendações. As respostas de vocês serão de vocês.

Direitos dos Membros

What are each member's rights, in proportion to what we ask of them?

Cláusulas RCOS 3.4.1, 3.4.3, 3.4.4
  • 3.4.1 A comunidade DEVE definir explicitamente os direitos dos membros.
  • 3.4.3 Direitos e obrigações DEVEM ser simétricos e proporcionais ao estado de filiação.
  • 3.4.4 Nenhuma obrigação PODE ser aplicada sem um direito correspondente e documentado.
Por que enumerar os direitos explicitamente?
Como preencher esta seção

O que abordar

  • For each membership state: which rights does a member in that state hold?
  • Which rights hold for everyone, in every state — such as raising a concern without retaliation, or leaving at any time?
  • Do the rights of each state match what we ask of that state, so that the more we ask, the more protection and say a member has?
  • Where a right is set in another document — voting in the Decision Matrix, roles in the Role Registry — do we point to it rather than write it twice?

Exemplos

Every member, in any state, may raise a conflict through the Conflict Resolution Ladder without retaliation, read the community's governance records, and leave at any time. Trial Members may also join all meetings and propose agenda items. Full Members may additionally vote on decisions as set out in the Decision Matrix, hold roles listed in the Role Registry, and propose changes to any agreement. Full Members carry the work rota and shared costs, so they also hold the vote that Trial Members do not.

Exemplos, não recomendações. As respostas de vocês serão de vocês.

Obrigações dos Membros

What does the community expect of each member — and where does that expectation stop?

Cláusulas RCOS 3.4.2, 3.4.4, 3.4.5
  • 3.4.2 A comunidade DEVE definir explicitamente as obrigações dos membros.
  • 3.4.4 Nenhuma obrigação PODE ser aplicada sem um direito correspondente e documentado.
  • 3.4.5 As obrigações NÃO DEVEM ser abertas ou indefinidas.
Por que delimitar as obrigações com firmeza?
Como preencher esta seção

O que abordar

  • For each obligation: what exactly is asked, and how would a member know whether they are meeting it?
  • Where does each obligation stop — how much, how often, for how long?
  • Which documented right does each obligation correspond to? (The rights themselves are their own question.)
  • Which obligations apply in every membership state, and which only in some?
  • Is there anything we quietly expect of members that is not written down — and should we write it down or drop it?

Exemplos

Every member keeps to our identity constraints, takes part in a conflict process when named as a party, does not speak for the community in public without a mandate from the general meeting, and does not use community money or accounts beyond the authority a role gives them. Each obligation is matched by a right in this agreement, such as the right to a fair process and to hold roles. Nothing else may be required of a member unless this list is changed by decision.

Exemplos, não recomendações. As respostas de vocês serão de vocês.

Expectativas de Participação e Contribuição

What counts as participation, how much is enough, may someone send a stand-in — and what happens when someone stops?

Cláusulas RCOS 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.3, 3.5.4
  • 3.5.1 As expectativas de participação DEVEM ser explicitamente definidas.
  • 3.5.2 As formas aceitáveis de contribuição DEVEM ser listadas.
  • 3.5.3 A substituição da participação (por exemplo, terceirização de trabalho) DEVE ser explicitamente regulamentada.
  • 3.5.4 A não-participação persistente DEVE acionar um processo de responsabilização conforme definido na Camada 4.
Por que definir a participação em números?
Como preencher esta seção

O que abordar

  • Which forms of contribution do we recognise?
  • How much is enough — how many contributions, of which kinds, over what period?
  • May someone send a stand-in, or pay someone to do their share — for which tasks, and who stays responsible?
  • How does someone tell us they will be away, and for how long can expectations be paused?
  • After how long without participation, and without notice, does an accountability process start — and who starts it? (What that process does is set in the Conflict Resolution Ladder.)

Exemplos

We recognise four forms of contribution: work-days on the land, cooking for shared meals, facilitating or taking minutes at meetings, and tasks from the maintenance rota. Each member contributes at least 8 hours a month across any of these. A member may swap a task with another member, but may not pay an outsider to do their share. Expectations pause for up to 3 months if the member tells the membership steward in advance. Two consecutive months below the minimum without notice opens an accountability check.

Exemplos, não recomendações. As respostas de vocês serão de vocês.

Referência ao Devido Processo

What protects a member when the community turns against them?

Cláusulas RCOS 3.6.3
  • 3.6.3 A saída forçada DEVE seguir o devido processo e ser conduzida por meio dos mecanismos da Camada 4.
Por que reafirmar o devido processo aqui?
Como preencher esta seção

O que abordar

  • Which documents protect a member against removal, suspension or restricted access — and does this agreement name each one?
  • In one or two plain sentences, what do we promise here, so that nobody is removed or restricted under a rule they were never shown?
  • How does a member reading this agreement find the current version of those documents?

Exemplos

No member can be removed, suspended or have their access restricted except through the processes in our Conflict Resolution Ladder and our Exit & Separation Protocol. Both are linked from this agreement. No rule that is not written in one of those two documents can be used against a member.

Exemplos, não recomendações. As respostas de vocês serão de vocês.

Registro de Ratificação

Who adopted this agreement, when, and how was it decided?

Gostaríamos de contar as visitas com o Google Analytics. Ele só grava cookies se você aceitar; recusar não muda mais nada no site. Política de privacidade