Aller au contenu

Déclaration de périmètre

Télécharger ce modèle

Généré le 2026-08-31 · Télécharger tous les modèles

Actifs dans le périmètre

What does the community own or steward together?

Clauses RCOS 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.4
  • 2.2.1 La communauté DOIT déclarer explicitement le périmètre de ce qu'elle gouverne.
  • 2.2.2 La déclaration de périmètre DOIT inclure, au minimum :
  • 2.2.4 Tout ce qui n'est pas explicitement déclaré comme étant dans le périmètre DOIT être considéré comme hors périmètre.
Pourquoi énumérer chaque actif gouverné ?
Comment remplir cette section

Ce qu’il faut couvrir

  • What do we own, hold or look after together — money, land, buildings, equipment, software, websites, accounts, our name and logo?
  • For each one: what exactly is it — which account, which plot, which domain — so no one can argue about what is meant?
  • What do individuals hold on the community's behalf, such as an account or a domain in a member's name — and do we count it as ours?
  • Is anything shared in practice that we have never named? (Which decisions and which work are collective are their own questions.)

Exemples

The collective governs: the shared treasury held in our two-of-three multi-signature wallet; the project website and its domain; the code repositories under the collective's organisation account; our chat server and social media accounts; and the collective's name, logo and published guides. Any account a member registers on the collective's behalf belongs to the collective.

Des exemples, pas des recommandations. Vos réponses vous appartiendront.

Domaines de décision dans le périmètre

Which decisions belong to the group rather than to individuals?

Clauses RCOS 2.2.1, 2.2.2
  • 2.2.1 La communauté DOIT déclarer explicitement le périmètre de ce qu'elle gouverne.
  • 2.2.2 La déclaration de périmètre DOIT inclure, au minimum :
Pourquoi nommer les domaines de décision, et pas seulement les actifs ?
Comment remplir cette section

Ce qu’il faut couvrir

  • What kinds of questions do we decide together — for example how we decide, who can join, how shared money is spent, how shared spaces are used?
  • For each one: where does it stop — what stays with an individual, a household or an outside party?
  • Are any decisions taken by one person today out of habit that we want to name as the group's — or say plainly are not? (How each kind of decision is made is its own question.)

Exemples

We decide together on: our governance rules and how decisions are made; who may join, and on what terms; how the shared budget and reserves are spent; the use and upkeep of the shared house, garden and guest rooms; and any agreement made in the community's name with an outside party. Decisions about each household's own flat stay with that household.

Des exemples, pas des recommandations. Vos réponses vous appartiendront.

Activités et responsabilités dans le périmètre

Which work and responsibilities are collective?

Clauses RCOS 2.2.1, 2.2.2
  • 2.2.1 La communauté DOIT déclarer explicitement le périmètre de ce qu'elle gouverne.
  • 2.2.2 La déclaration de périmètre DOIT inclure, au minimum :
Pourquoi déclarer le travail dont la communauté est responsable ?
Comment remplir cette section

Ce qu’il faut couvrir

  • What ongoing work are we responsible for as a community — upkeep, welcoming new members, keeping accounts, looking after our name, hosting visitors?
  • For each one: is it done regularly or only when needed, and what goes wrong if no one does it?
  • Is anyone doing work today that nobody formally took on — and should it be collective, or should we say it is not? (Who does each piece of work is decided when roles are assigned.)

Exemples

As a community we are responsible for: maintaining the shared water supply, paths and solar system; running the vegetable garden and orchard; admitting and welcoming new members; keeping the accounts and reporting on them twice a year; and hosting visitors and volunteers. Work on private dwellings and personal gardens is not a collective responsibility.

Des exemples, pas des recommandations. Vos réponses vous appartiendront.

Explicitement hors périmètre

What is none of the community's business — and stays that way?

Clauses RCOS 2.2.3, 2.2.4, 2.2.5
  • 2.2.3 La déclaration de périmètre DOIT lister explicitement ce qui est hors périmètre.
  • 2.2.4 Tout ce qui n'est pas explicitement déclaré comme étant dans le périmètre DOIT être considéré comme hors périmètre.
  • 2.2.5 La communauté NE DOIT PAS exercer d'autorité sur des personnes, des actifs ou des domaines déclarés hors périmètre.
Pourquoi nommer ce que la communauté ne doit pas toucher ?
Comment remplir cette section

Ce qu’il faut couvrir

  • What might people assume the community has a say in, that it does not — members' money, relationships, jobs, beliefs, or other projects they belong to?
  • Which outside organisations, services or neighbours do we work with but have no authority over?
  • Do we say plainly that anything not named as in scope is out of scope, even if this list does not mention it?
  • What happens to a decision that reaches into something on this list — does it simply have no effect?

Exemples

The following are out of scope: members' personal income, savings and private finances; their private relationships and how they arrange their own homes; their paid work and projects outside the community; and the hosting companies and software services we use, whose terms we accept but do not govern. Anything not declared in scope is out of scope, and a community decision that reaches into these areas has no effect.

Des exemples, pas des recommandations. Vos réponses vous appartiendront.

Registre de ratification

Who adopted this scope, when, and how was it decided?

Nous aimerions compter les visites avec Google Analytics. Les cookies ne sont déposés que si vous acceptez ; refuser ne change rien d'autre sur le site. Politique de confidentialité