Zum Inhalt springen

Betriebshandbuch

Diese Vorlage herunterladen

Erzeugt am 2026-08-31 · Alle Vorlagen herunterladen

Zentrale Betriebsprozesse

Which things have to keep happening every week — and are they written down anywhere?

RCOS-Klauseln 7.3.4, 7.7.2, 7.6.3
  • 7.3.4 Kritische Betriebsprozesse MUSS so dokumentiert sein, dass die Kontinuität nicht von implizitem Wissen einzelner Personen abhängt.
  • 7.7.2 Kritische Betriebsprozesse DARF NICHT ausschließlich auf individuellem Gedächtnis, gutem Willen oder informeller Weitergabe beruhen.
  • 7.6.3 Das Betriebshandbuch MUSS mindestens Folgendes definieren:
Warum kritische Prozesse dokumentieren?
Wie ihr das ausfüllt

Was hineingehört

  • Which processes have to keep happening for the community to work — onboarding, exit, publishing proposals, recording contributions, running meetings, managing money, reviewing platform access, and anything else?
  • For each process: which role owns it, and what does it involve in two or three sentences?
  • For each process: where are the steps written down, so someone new could carry it out without asking the person who usually does it? (Where our documents live in general is its own question.)
  • Which of these still depends on one person's memory or goodwill — and who will write it up, by when?
  • How do we keep each written process up to date when the way we actually do it changes? (Handoffs between roles are their own question.)

Beispiele

Our core processes are member onboarding and member exit (Membership Admin, following those protocols), proposal publication (Governance Secretary), contribution recording (Contribution Steward), the weekly meeting (rotating facilitator: agenda, notes, action list), treasury management (Finance Steward) and platform access review (Infrastructure Steward, monthly, removing exited members). Each has a one-page checklist in the shared handbook that a new role holder can follow without help, and the owner updates it within a week of any change in practice.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Temporäre und Ad-hoc-Verantwortlichkeiten

How do we stop a temporary favour becoming somebody's permanent unpaid job?

RCOS-Klauseln 7.1.5, 7.1.4, 7.7.1
  • 7.1.5 Temporäre oder Ad-hoc-Verantwortlichkeiten MUSS explizit zeitlich begrenzt sein und DARF NICHT ohne formale Rollendefinition dauerhaft werden.
  • 7.1.4 Keine laufende Verantwortlichkeit KANN ohne eine explizite Rolle bestehen, und keine Person KANN für Verantwortlichkeiten zur Rechenschaft gezogen werden, die nicht formal einer Rolle zugewiesen sind.
  • 7.7.1 Laufende Verantwortlichkeiten DARF NICHT ohne eine explizite Rolle bestehen.
Warum temporäre Verantwortlichkeiten begrenzen?
Wie ihr das ausfüllt

Was hineingehört

  • When someone takes on a temporary task, how is its end set — a date, or a clear condition that marks it done?
  • Where is it recorded as temporary at the moment it is handed out, and by whom?
  • What is the longest a temporary responsibility may run, extensions included, before it must become a formal role or stop?
  • Who checks on it before the end date, and how is it either ended or turned into a proper role? (Defining the new role is a Role Registry question.)

Beispiele

Every temporary task is given with an end date or a clear "done when" condition and logged as temporary on the task board by whoever assigns it. A week before it ends, the assigner and the person doing it check in: the task either ends, or it is proposed as a new role for the Role Registry. No temporary responsibility may run longer than 90 days in total, extensions included.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Rollen- und Zuständigkeitsschnittstellen

Where does one role's work end and the next one's begin?

RCOS-Klauseln 7.6.3, 7.3.4
  • 7.6.3 Das Betriebshandbuch MUSS mindestens Folgendes definieren:
  • 7.3.4 Kritische Betriebsprozesse MUSS so dokumentiert sein, dass die Kontinuität nicht von implizitem Wissen einzelner Personen abhängt.
Warum Übergaben explizit abbilden?
Wie ihr das ausfüllt

Was hineingehört

  • Which roles regularly pass work to each other?
  • For each handoff: what is handed over, in which direction, and how does the receiving role know it has arrived?
  • At what point does the work stop being the first role's responsibility and become the next one's?
  • Where does work pass between a role and a meeting — for example, a decision that a role must then carry out?
  • When a handoff gets dropped, who notices and who sorts it out?

Beispiele

Membership Admin to Infrastructure Steward: when a new member's trial starts, the admin posts their details in the access channel and the steward sets up accounts within three days; on exit the same route removes them. Finance Steward to Contribution Steward: at each month-end the finance steward shares amounts paid in so contribution records can be reconciled. Governance meeting to role holders: each adopted decision is assigned to a named role in the notes, and that role confirms it has picked it up.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Belastungsgrenzen

How much time, meeting and care can we ask of one person — and what happens when someone is overloaded?

RCOS-Klauseln 7.4.1, 7.4.2, 7.4.3, 7.4.4, 7.7.3
  • 7.4.1 Zeit, Aufmerksamkeit, Koordinationskapazität und emotionale Arbeit MUSS als endliche und begrenzte Ressourcen behandelt werden.
  • 7.4.2 Die Gemeinschaft MUSS explizite Belastungsgrenzen definieren, darunter:
  • 7.4.3 Belastungsgrenzen MUSS durch einen autorisierten Governance-Prozess überprüfbar und anpassbar sein.
  • 7.4.4 Anhaltende Überlastung, Burnout-Risiko, chronische Nicht-Teilnahme oder Abhängigkeit von übermäßig engagierten Einzelpersonen MUSS Überprüfungs- oder Reparaturprozesse auslösen, wie in Schicht 4 definiert.
  • 7.7.3 Sitzungsbelastung, Koordinationsaufwand und unbezahlte oder unsichtbare Arbeit MUSS begrenzt und überprüfbar sein.
Warum Belastungsgrenzen explizit machen?
Wie ihr das ausfüllt

Was hineingehört

  • How much meeting time can we ask of one person — how often, how long, and what counts as an extra meeting?
  • How many roles or hours a week may one person carry — counting unseen work like hosting, cleaning up or emotional support?
  • What reply times do we expect — for everyday messages, urgent operational matters and safety issues — and when is nobody expected to answer?
  • When someone says they are overloaded, how is their work covered, handed on or shared out — and how quickly?
  • What signs tell us there is a pattern — lasting overload, burnout, members going quiet, or everything resting on a few people — and which review or repair process does that start?
  • How often do we review these limits, and how are they changed?

Beispiele

Recurring meetings take up at most four hours a month per person; an extra meeting needs 72 hours' notice. Nobody holds more than two roles or about eight hours a week, care and hosting work included. Messages get a reply within three days, urgent operational ones within a day, safety issues at once. Anyone can say they are overloaded, and their tasks are reshared within two weeks; overload flagged twice in a quarter goes to our review-and-repair process. These limits are reviewed yearly and changed by proposal.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Betriebliche Kontinuität

If any one of us disappeared for a month, what would stop working?

RCOS-Klauseln 7.5.1, 7.5.2, 7.5.3
  • 7.5.1 Die Gemeinschaft MUSS sicherstellen, dass keine einzelne Person ein kritischer Single Point of Failure für den Kernbetrieb ist.
  • 7.5.2 Zentrale Betriebsrollen und -prozesse MUSS Folgendes beinhalten:
  • 7.5.3 Die Planung der Betriebskontinuität MUSS regelmäßig überprüft werden.
Warum jetzt schon Kontinuität planen?
Wie ihr das ausfüllt

Was hineingehört

  • Honestly, who or what is a single point of failure today — a person, account, key or skill that only one of us has?
  • For each one: what is our plan to share it, and by when?
  • For each core role and process: is the procedure written down, and what must be handed over before the holder leaves?
  • Who backs up each core role — and where is a backup not yet possible?
  • How often do we review this, and what else triggers a review, such as a role changing hands?

Beispiele

Today only one member can access the bank account and only one understands the water system. By March a second bank signatory will be added, and the water system will have a written guide and a trained deputy. Every core role has a named backup and a handover checklist that must be completed before the holder steps down. The Infrastructure Steward reviews this list every quarter and whenever a role changes hands.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Informationsfluss und Anti-Gatekeeping

How do we make sure nobody has to go through one person to find something out?

RCOS-Klauseln 7.3.5, 7.7.4, 7.3.2
  • 7.3.5 Der Informationsfluss MUSS so gestaltet sein, dass Gatekeeping, Engpässe oder Abhängigkeit von informellen Vermittlern verhindert werden.
  • 7.7.4 Regeln für den Informationszugang MUSS explizit und durchsetzbar sein.
  • 7.3.2 Dokumentationsregeln MUSS mindestens Folgendes festlegen:
Warum Informationszugang als Governance-Thema behandeln?
Wie ihr das ausfüllt

Was hineingehört

  • Which records can every Full Member open directly, without asking anyone — decisions, meeting notes, roles, membership, contributions? (Restricted and private records are their own question.)
  • How soon after a meeting must notes and decisions be published?
  • When someone asks for information they are entitled to, who must answer, and within how long?
  • How do we make sure no single person or role is the only way in to information others need — passwords, files, contacts?
  • What happens when someone holds back information a member is entitled to?

Beispiele

Every Full Member can read decisions, meeting notes, role assignments, membership status and contribution records in the shared drive without asking anyone. Meeting notes are posted within 48 hours. Any other request for information a member is entitled to is answered within five days. Every shared account and folder has at least two people with access, and withholding information a member is entitled to is treated as an accountability issue under our conflict process.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Dokumentationsstandorte und Aktualisierungsverfahren

What do we write down, where, and who may read it — and can every decision be traced to who made it and how?

RCOS-Klauseln 7.3.1, 7.3.2, 7.3.3, 7.8.1
  • 7.3.1 Die Gemeinschaft MUSS explizite Dokumentationsregeln für Entscheidungen, Rollen, Betriebsabläufe und gemeinsame Pflichten definieren.
  • 7.3.2 Dokumentationsregeln MUSS mindestens Folgendes festlegen:
  • 7.3.3 Alle Entscheidungen MUSS rückverfolgbar sein auf:
  • 7.8.1 Folgendes MUSS explizit sein:
Warum festhalten, wo jedes Dokument lebt?
Wie ihr das ausfüllt

Was hineingehört

  • For each kind of record — our governance documents, member registry, meeting notes, proposals, contribution records: where does the official copy live, who keeps it, and how often is it reviewed?
  • What must be written down about decisions, roles, day-to-day operations and shared obligations — what does each record have to contain at minimum?
  • Who may read which records, and which are restricted for privacy — on what grounds, and who may still see them?
  • When must a new record be published or announced, and to whom?
  • Does every decision record say what type of decision it was and which area it covers, who had the authority, how it was decided and by what threshold, the outcome, and when it takes effect?
  • Where can anyone find, written down, our roles, who may decide what, our meeting types, and our access and privacy rules?

Beispiele

Governance documents, the member registry and proposals live in the shared drive, kept by the Secretary and reviewed yearly; meeting notes and contribution records live on the wiki, kept by each facilitator and the Contribution Steward and reviewed quarterly. Every decision record states its type and area, who decided, the mechanism and threshold, the outcome and its start date, and is announced within three days. Members can read everything except health, safeguarding and conflict records, which only the people involved and two named stewards may see.

Beispiele, keine Empfehlungen. Eure Antworten werden eure eigenen sein.

Ratifizierungsnachweis

Wir würden Besuche gern mit Google Analytics zählen. Cookies werden nur gesetzt, wenn du zustimmst; eine Ablehnung ändert sonst nichts an der Website. Datenschutz